|
When Microsoft launched Windows XP in the fall of 2001, many
ICON members asked me if they should upgrade to the new operating
system. My answer was
"That depends." XP had
some pretty hefty system requirements compared to the previous
versions. If your current system was fairly up-to-date, you
could probably upgrade with the addition of a new driver or
two, if not, you might have to buy a new computer just to
run Windows XP. The answer to whether one should upgrade was
then
"That depends". Followed by
"Does
your existing computer do what you need/want it to do"?
With the launch, I intended to upgrade to the new OS, but
for several reasons, never did. My computer was a 333 mhz
Intel Celeron processor with 128 mb of RAM running Win ME,
and while it would do everything I needed it to do, I wanted
(a valid reason!) to upgrade to the latest operating system.
Using Microsoft's XP compatibility tester, I checked to see
if I could make the jump to XP. It appeared that my old machine
was upgradeable if I installed some additional memory and
driver updates, however, it would require so much of the computing
resources that my other software might cause the system to
freeze while trying to perform the tasks I wanted to do, so
I continued using the system I had...until recently.
Sarah and I had talked about an upgrade for both of us ever
since the XP launch but hated to spend the money, and we could
both still work with what we had, so neither of us had made
the jump. Because of the demands of web site design, Sarah's
500 mhz Pentium III was becoming so over-worked by her computing
needs that it locked up frequently, causing her to have to
reboot. Still, we resisted the investment required to upgrade
until her hard drive began to fail. At that point, the question
was not whether to upgrade, but rather, with what. We would
have to answer "That depends" very quickly!
Our solution was a practical one. To fulfill Sarah's computing
needs, we chose a powerful processor with plenty of RAM and
high end graphics capability. We also felt that since DVDs
hold so much more data than CDs, that we should include a
DVD burner. Toss into the mix, the portability of a laptop,
and we had the solution she needed. This still didn't solve
my problem, as I was still using a relatively slow processor
with an older operating system.
I took her old desktop machine, installed a new hard drive,
doubled the RAM to 512 mb and upgraded to WIN XP Pro. Voila!...although
the 500 mhz Pentium III is not very fast by today's standards,
it answers "That depends" very well for me, at least
for now.
Some of the most recent questions I have fielded from ICON
members include: "Would I be better off with a laptop"?
"What digital camera should I buy"? Should I use
CD-Rs or CD-RWs"? "Which brand of printer should
I buy"? And the answer is
"That depends"
on
you and your needs/wants.
If you have questions similar to the ones I have described,
share them with the rest of us. One of the great benefits
of ICON membership is that others will gladly share their
insight regarding your computing experience and help you clarify
just what your "That depends"
is.
Happy Computing 
Terry
|